I
certainly thought that the stories about chelation therapy were a bit too good
to be true and quackery was certainly on my mind when a physician friend of
mine 10 years ago prompted me to register for the training course in the
This
group, also through the American Board of Chelation Therapy (ABCT) of
At
the first training course I learned that it was an accidental discovery in the
1950's that patients who were treated for serious lead poisoning with EDTA
chelation, reported substantial improvement in accompanying conditions such as
circulatory (eg. angina) and inflammatory (eg. rheumatism) disorders.
Physicians at that time were excited about those findings and active research
into EDTA chelation for hardening of the arteries was pursued into the early
1960's but stopped after the patent protection on EDTA had run out. But the
therapy called EDTA chelation would not die and by now it is estimated that
about 500,000 Americans alone take this treatment every year.
How
is this treatment supposed to work? The simplest and crudest analogy has been
that chelation works on blood vessels like DRANO works on clogged pipes. I
prefer to explain: the EDTA molecule acts as a magnet that will bind with toxic
metals such as lead and cadmium (we all have too much of these stored away in
brain and bones) but also with minerals such as calcium.
Once
infused, the EDTA molecule is quickly excreted by the kidneys with toxic metals
or minerals attached, whereas normally the body cannot excrete these toxins.
For one thing, EDTA detoxifies you of heavy metals which frees up poisoned
repair enzymes in the cells. EDTA chelation also removes calcium deposits from
soft tissues (such as blood vessels), and this has been proven by the new
technique of 'ultrafast cat scanning.' This likely explains the increased blood
circulation that we see in our patients.
A
fequently asked question is: Can this removal of calcium from soft tissues lead
to thinning of the bones too? It does not have a negative effect on bones
because EDTA stimulates the output of parathyroid hormone and this effect
indirectly strengthens the bone.
Why
is there so much opposition? When done by untrained practitioners, there could
theoretically be kidney damage from the treatment (and it happened 30 years ago
when the proper dosage formula had not been worked out). However, when done
correctly, kidney function almost universally improves with just a few treatments.
This is due to improved microcirculation in the kidney tissue. The opponents of
chelation also say that there are no large scale double blind studies. That is
correct but there are no such studies about angioplasty or bypass surgery
either. There are however, over 2,000 positive articles on chelation in the
world medical literature.
All
this and more can easily be confirmed by reading books about chelation such as
"Forty Something Forever" by Arline Brecher or "Bypassing
Bypass" by Elmer Cranton. I usually close my lectures with the old medical
wisdom: "You are (only) as old as your blood vessels."
Other
Benefits of Chelation: